Your browser is not Javascript enable or you have turn it off. We recommend you to activate for better security reasonGoogle TV Streamer review - FlatpanelsHD

Review: Google TV Streamer

|


Google has abandoned Chromecast, which is no longer being produced, to focus on the Google TV Streamer. It switches from being a dongle to a compact box form format, and now features an Ethernet port alongside WiFi. It still runs the Google TV operating system but comes with some new features under the hood for controlling connected home devices and a refreshed remote.

FlatpanelsHD has tested the Google TV Streamer up against Nvidia Shield (2019), Chromecast and other media players.

Price and retailers:

US retailer
UK retailer
DE retailer

Google TV Streamer - specifications

4K, up tp 60fps
HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision
(HxWxD)25.4 x 76.2 x 162.6 mm
161.6 g
1x HDMI 2.0
USB Type-C power
Ethernet (Gigabit)
MediaTek MT8696 SoC
4x ARM A55 2.0GHz CPU
Imagination Technologies' PowerVR Rogue GE9215 GPU
4GB RAM
32GB storage (24GB free)
Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Digital
WiFi 5 (802.11ac standard)
Bluetooth 5.1
MPEG2
MPEG4
HEVC
VP9-2
AV1
Google TV (Android 14)
Built-in Google Cast
Remote control
Support for mouse and keyboard (USB & trådløs)
Support for Bluetooth game controllers
Google TV Streamer device
Remote control
USB-C cable
Starter guide

First impressions

One of the biggest surprises with the Google TV Streamer – aside from the name change – is that Google is abandoning the dongle format in favor of a box format. For almost a decade, there has been a near-manic idea that streaming devices should be as small and cheap as possible. FlatpanelsHD has referred to it as the "race to the bottom" and argued that it is a bleak vision for the future of the TV ecosystem. We fail to understand the desire to downgrade hardware to such a miserable state that one cannot realize the immense possibilities that lie within a media box – especially since a box can be just as easily tucked away as a dongle thanks to Bluetooth operation. Google's strategic shift validates competitors like Nvidia (Shield) and Apple's approaches – and we expect the calls for an Apple dongle will quiet down. Amazon and Roku have also been leading the charge in the race to the bottom, but the difference is that their best device throughout has remained a box. Let us see what Amazon and Roku's next moves will be. The Google TV Streamer is white, which makes it a bit too obvious against wooden furniture and black cables (it comes with a white power cable, but no HDMI cable). However, as mentioned, it can easily be hidden away. It has a slightly atypical box shape; taller at the back to accommodate the ports. On the back, you will find USB-C and Gigabit Ethernet, which Chromecast lacked (required an optional, special power supply with an Ethernet port).
Another crucial reason for Google switching to a box format is that the Google TV Streamer is intended to act as a hub for the smart home, with a built-in Thread radio. The back of the TV is one of the worst places for wireless connection in the home, as most TVs have a shielded back to keep signals away from the electronics. By moving all wireless communication into a separate box, one avoids that pitfall. A box format also allows for significantly more powerful and better hardware, though i tis by no means a guarantee of powerful hardware, which we will look into shortly.

Setup and operation

Setting up Google TV Streamer is not difficult, but it takes a bit of time (around 20 minutes for us). You can set it up directly on-screen or use the Google Home smartphone app, which is a big help when it comes to entering usernames and passwords and WiFi credentials. During the setup process, a software update had to be downloaded and installed, and we had to accept a lot of terms to let Google collect and use our user data. At one point, the setup via the app failed, so we had to continue on the TV – thankfully not from the beginning. The biggest irritation remains that you have to log into all your streaming apps manually afterward – just like on other TV platforms. However, several apps have now adopted QR codes, which makes it a bit easier.

Google TV Streamer vs. Chromecast

Left: Remote control for Chromecast with Google TV. Right: Remote control for Google TV Streamer. Photo: FlatpanelsHD

The remote control has become a bit longer and features a new "Magic" button (with a star on it, at the bottom) that can be user-configured to open any app or control Google Home devices. It can also be set to switch input sources (HDMI ports) on the TV, meaning that with repeated presses you can "scroll" through the list of input sources on the TV. You cannot press down/up on the remote or 'OK' once you have landed on the right input source, but the TV's input selector typically activates itself if you just highlight the input source and wait. It worked as expected with an LG TV during our testing.

Google TV Magic button

The new magic button on the remote control can be user-configured. Photo: FlatpanelsHD

The two sponsored buttons, Netflix and YouTube, can only be reprogrammed using a remapper app such as Button Remapper, which is free from the Google Play Store. You first need to go to Google TV's Settings -> Accessibility and allow Button Remapper to change the function of buttons. You can define single-click, double-click and long-click, meaning the same button can actually perform three different actions. Of course, you will still have YouTube and Netflix printed on the buttons. Ideally, these two app buttons should have been the same type of magic button, as described above, which can be configured without further hassle. Despite the minor changes, the remote control overall feels like the one that came with Chromecast. Neither of the two is particularly pleasant to use. Made entirely of white plastic, they resemble something more akin to controller for a child's toy than a link between the user and the interface on the TV. Only the AAA batteries give it a little weight. In other words, it is not rechargeable. A positive change is that the volume control buttons have been moved away from the side of the remote onto the top surface, so you no longer have to fiddle with them. Overall, I think the new button layout is a lot more logical. However, I do not understand why Google and TV makers in general do not put more effort into the design, material selection and overall appeal of the remote control. On a TV device, the remote control is the only thing you touch, and you do so every time you watch TV.
Functionality, on the other hand, is a completely different – and positive – story. As before, the remote control can turn the TV on and off and control the volume. It is automatically set up for your TV brand, provided HDMI CEC is enabled on the TV. Almost all TV models from the last 10-15 years support HDMI CEC. There is a dedicated power button, and although it is not really necessary in a modern TV context, many may still prefer to have one. You can also turn on the TV using the Home button on the remote. Additionally, there is now a 'Find my remote' feature, which can be activated by pressing the physical button on the back of the box itself, causing the remote control to emit a relatively loud beep for 30 seconds.

Google TV Streamer vs. Chromecast

Remember to enable HDMI CEC on your TV in addition to Google TV Streamer. Photo: FlatpanelsHD

Certain aspects of Google TV can be controlled by voice. By pressing the voice button, you can, for example, search for content on Google TV. This can also be done via external speakers, such as Google Nest, which relays commands to Google TV. As we mentioned in previous reviews, we have had poor experiences with Google Assistant in relation to finding movies and series on Google TV. Often, you get completely irrelevant results from YouTube, and too few apps are integrated into the search, which is surprising for a company that has built its business on search.

Google TV Streamer vs. Chromecast

Google Assistant is not very good but at least we did not get irrelevant YouTube results when searching for 'Lord of the Rings.' Photo: FlatpanelsHD

Measurements

Google TV Streamer has an ARM-based CPU, which means power consumption is at the same low level as similar boxes, including its predecessor. Despite its much more powerful hardware, Apple TV 4K (2022) is still leading in energy efficiency due to a newer 5nm processor node.
Power consumptionApple TV 4K (2022)Nvidia Shield (2019)Chromecast with Google TV 4KGoogle TV Streamer
Video streaming1.9 – 2.3WUp to 6.9W2 – 3.5W2.4 – 3.5W
Gaming2.0 – 6W5.0 – 11W2.0 – 3.2W2.3 – 4.3W
Menus1.8W3.2W1.7W1.7W
Standby0.8W1.9W0.9W1.2W

Google TV Streamer as a media player

The Google TV interface remains the same on the Google TV Streamer, and for most users outside the US you face the same limitations (lack of tabs, content integration, free channels, etc.) as on other Google TV devices despite the upgrade to Android 14. Google focuses on the US and as a non-American you just have to accept that. The difference between Google TV in the US and most other regions illustrated:
The homescreen has more tabs in the US including 'For You' and 'Live'. Photo: FlatpanelsHD
Google TV also offers thematic sections (left) in the US. Photo: FlatpanelsHD
If you are not familiar with Google TV, it is essentially a homescreen where content from streaming services is pulled to the forefront, making it easier to access. However, this requires that streaming services utilize Google's developer tools, APIs. Only a handfuld of streaming services have done this and even if a given service has done so it is not guaranteed that it will appear in the carousel at the top or in "recommendations". Access to these features relies on commercial agreements with Google and at least some "recommendations" are treated as promoted content. Nonetheless, Google TV overall provides a good user experience where it is relatively easy to find content you are currently watching and get inspiration for new content. If you prefer to use the streaming services' own apps they are available below and you can sort the app row as you wish. Compared to the older Chromecast dongles, the big change of course is that you have a complete TV interface built around apps, controlled with a remote. This allows you to focus on watching TV instead of fiddling with a smartphone and the many distracting smartphone apps. Your entire family will thank you! We will not spend much more time on the Google TV part as it is almost identical to the interface on Chromecast with Google TV and all TV models built on Google TV. However, it is worth noting that the Google TV interface has been in 4K resolution since Android 12, of course also on Google TV Streamer with Android 14.
The Google TV interface. Photo: FlatpanelsHD
If you do not want recommendations and ads on your homescreen, you can activate 'Apps only mode' under Settings -> Accounts and Login -> Your user. There are also various options for screensavers:

Google TV screensaver

Screensavers on Google TV. Photo: FlatpanelsHD

A new feature in Google TV Streamer is Gemini integration, which is Google's latest attempt at an AI bot. On movie pages in the Google Play Store, you will find an AI-generated summary of the film and curated reviews. This also works outside the US when the Google TV Streamer is set to English as seen below. "AI" – artificial intelligence – is the new buzzword, but it is hard to understand why AI is required for a summary that the film studios themselves provide or for reviews, which sites like Rotten Tomatoes or IMDb curate. This Gemini integration seems more like a 'hack job', as the interface is also very clunky and difficult to navigate. AI on the TV? Not yet, no thanks.
Gemini AI integration on Google TV is not very good, and user navigation is clunky. Photo: FlatpanelsHD
As always, Google Cast (Chromecast) is built into Google TV. It is a software implementation of the hardware dongle that Chromecast started its life as, but there are certain differences. Built-in Google Cast supports 4K and HDR, but, like the Chromecast dongle, it does not match frame rates, meaning that all content in 25/50fps and all content from, for example, European distributors (including 24fps movies/series sped up to 25fps) will stutter, as Google TV outputs at 60Hz by default. Another difference with built-in Chromecast is that you typically need to be logged into the specific streaming service, meaning that built-in Chromecast counts as an additional device in case the streaming service has a cap of logged in devices. This was not the case with the old Chromecast. Instead, the differences are found in hardware. Here is what FlatpanelsHD has discovered:
  1. Chromecast with Google TV was built on an Amlogic S905D3G system chip with 4x ARM A55 1.9GHz CPU cores, Mali-31 GPU, 2GB RAM, and 8GB storage
  2. Google TV Streamer switches chipset manufacturer to MediaTek and an MT8696 system chip with 4x ARM A55 2.0GHz CPU cores, Imagination Technologies' PowerVR Rogue GE9215 GPU, 4GB RAM and 32GB (only 24GB available for the user)
Although Google TV Streamer switches from Amlogic to MediaTek, the CPU is essentially the same, just clocked slightly higher. You get double the RAM, which is a welcome addition. However, it is disappointing to note that the MediaTek MT8696 system chip found in the Google TV Streamer first appeared in the 2021 edition of Amazon's Fire TV Stick 4K Max, a small streaming dongle similar to Chromecast. It is a small chipset designed for dongles – not boxes. In other words, Google TV Streamer is essentially built on hardware from 2021. Here we have run benchmarks on the CPU and GPU:

Google TV – CPU/GPU benchmark

CPU – Geekbench 4 (single-core & multi-core)
MediaTek MT5887
Philips OLED805
612
1716
YouSee Audio
783
1760
Chromecast med Google TV (4K)
895
2357
Google TV Streamer
924
2554
MediaTek MT5889
TCL C845 X1
929
2256
MediaTek Pentonic 700
TCL C805, X955
971
2452
MediaTek MT5895
Sony XH90, X90J, X90K, X90L, Philips OLED807
1195
2882
MediaTek Pentonic 1000
Philips OLED809
1327
3271
MediaTek Pentonic 1000
Sony A95L, XR90
1359
3342
Nvidia Shield TV
1400
4100
Apple A10X
Apple TV 4K 1st Gen
4000
9500
GPU – GFXBench (1080p Manhattan 3.1 & Aztec Ruins), 3D Mark (Slingshot Extreme)
YouSee Audio
fails
fails
fails
MediaTek MT5887
Philips OLED805
fails
142
450
MediaTek MT5889
TCL C845 X1
277
173
423
Chromecast with Google TV (4K)
330
164
373
Google TV Streamer
329
173
371
MediaTek Pentonic 700
TCL C805, X955
281
174
421
MediaTek MT5895
Sony XH90, X90J, X90K, X90L, Philips OLED807
958
605
1148
MediaTek Pentonic 1000
Philips OLED809
1266
847
1903
MediaTek Pentonic 1000
Sony A95L, XR90
-
-
1913
Nvidia Shield TV
2765
2250
4250
Apple A10X
Apple TV 4K 1st Gen
4500
3300
-
FlatpanelsHD
In its announcement, Google claimed that Google TV Streamer has a 22% faster CPU than Chromecast with Google TV, which was launched as a 4K version in 2020 and an HD version in 2022. Our benchmark shows that the CPU is 3% faster on single-core CPU and 8% faster on multi-core CPU compared to the 4K Chromecast with Google TV, so Google's comparison likely refers to the HD version of Chromecast (which we currently do not have). It is, of course, a very disappointing "increase" considering that Google TV Streamer is a 2024 device and has switched from dongle to box format. The CPU performance is comparable to a typical TV with built-in Google TV (also built on MediaTek). Meanwhile, the GPU in Google TV Streamer delivers exactly the same performance as the 4K Chromecast with Google TV – very poor performance.
Nvidia Shield 2019 (black), Google TV Streamer (box) and Chromecast with Google TV (dongle). Photo: FlatpanelsHD
I should add that Google TV Streamer is limited to WiFi 5 and Bluetooth 5.1. The latter means that you can listen to TV audio on maximum one pair of Bluetooth headphones at a time. in other words Google TV Streamer is far from matching the hardware of even the first generation of Nvidia Shield from 2016 and even further from matching the first generation of Apple TV 4K from 2017. It is a surprise to us that Google has chosen such weak hardware in a box format that allows for more expansion, and our gut feeling tells us that this device was originally supposed to launch earlier – supported by the many leaks. The hardware in Google's streaming devices sets clear limitations today and in the future in relation to what apps and processes can run on-device, while advanced games running locally on the device remains a utopia. A more relevant factor is the loading time and smoothness of the homescreen and video apps like Disney+ and Netflix. Here, Google TV Streamer feels faster than our Chromecast – likely due to the increased amount of RAM – but it is a fairly low bar as our Chromecast today is so slow that it is frustrating to use. This has happened as it has been updated and more apps have been installed. We find it hard to imagine that Google TV Streamer will not also get slower over time when Google begins to do more ambitious things in software. There are already signs of aging, for example that Android in Google TV Streamer still runs in 32-bit. There are today examples of Android apps that require 64-bit to run. One of our other major criticisms of Chromecast related to storage capacity. Here, Google has fortunately stepped up by going from 8GB to 32GB, although only 24GB is available to the user. This means that in addition to Netflix and others you can run apps like Plex and Kodi without constantly running into storage issues. Since locally run games are a utopia, 24GB of storage is enough for now, but if Google wants to develop its TV platform into a more ambitious project we will need much more storage in the near future.

Google TV Streamer apps

There are heaps of apps for Google TV, including apps like Plex and Kodi. Photo: FlatpanelsHD

It is possible to expand storage with an external USB drive or hard drive. It must be formatted in exFAT. NTFS will not work. Apps can be installed directly on the external device. However, to get started, you will need to connect a USB-C hub to Google TV Streamer, and it must have power pass-through since Google TV Streamer gets its power through its sole USB-C port. We noted that the increased amount of RAM also ensured that more apps can be kept in short-term memory, so apps do not have to be restarted every time you open them, including multiple games at once. This helps improve the user experience. Let us turn our focus to video streaming. Google TV Streamer boasts HDMI 2.1, but as usual, this does not really mean much. The HDMI port is actually limited to HDMI 2.0 bandwidth; up to 4K 60Hz with HDR. It supports all four relevant HDR formats: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG and Dolby Vision, so here you are fully covered. With content in four HDR formats and different frame rates (24, 25, 30, 50, 60fps etc.), it is always important that a box can "match" to avoid content being played in incorrect colors/brightness and to avoid video stuttering. If you are coming from the old Chromecast dongles, you will have suffered through the limitation that all 25/50fps content, output in 60Hz, stutters. In other words certain frames in the video stream must be shown twice. The Android TV operating system has had a well-functioning match system for SDR/HDR for years, meaning the box will automatically switch its HDMI output between SDR, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG and Dolby Vision, depending on the content format. This still works fine on Google TV Streamer, which switches seamlessly including on Netflix, Disney+, YouTube, the Apple TV app and Prime Video, though with certain exceptions with the oldest HDR-compatible TVs without Dolby Vision support above 30Hz; here Google TV Streamer selects SDR even though the content is in Dolby Vision. This is due to lack of frame rate matching. Frame rate matching is a trickier affair. Since Android 12, frame rate matching has been built into the Android TV software, but due to Android's less controlling nature (specifically the video player), it is up to each streaming provider to implement frame rate matching in their app via Google's API tools. Not many have done this. As FlatpanelsHD exclusively reported in October 2022, Netflix was the first major streaming service to support frame rate matching on Android. It still does this and a difference compared to Chromecast with Google TV is that Netflix on Google TV Streamer (or Android 14?) also matches to 25/50fps, so for example, Formula 1: Drive to Survive no longer stutters in 60Hz but instead plays stutter-free in 50Hz. We checked again whether other apps like Apple TV, Disney+, Max and YouTube Play have implemented frame rate matching, but nothing has changed since then so a lot of content on Google TV Streamer stutters during playback.
Netflix supports frame rate matching on Google TV Streamer, if the match feature is enabled, but other streaming services do not. Photo: FlatpanelsHD
It is a frustrating limitation that makes it difficult for us to recommend Chromecast and Google TV Streamer to enthusiasts. Even more frustrating is the fact that some other Android TV boxes have working frame rate matching implemented at the app level – not content level. Google should prioritize getting this fixed as it is currently one of the biggest issues with their streaming devices. We recommend that viewers in PAL regions, including Europe, change the video output on Google TV Streamer from 4K 60Hz (Auto) to 4K 50Hz if they primarily watch local content. Now, Hollywood content will stutter instead – there is no middle ground on Google TV Streamer.

Google TV Refresh rate

Google TV Streamer is set to Auto (60Hz), but Europeans should probably switch to 4K 50Hz. Photo: FlatpanelsHD

Apps for playing local media files, such as Kodi and Plex, have better implementation of frame rate matching, and Google TV Streamer is an OK device for use with local media files. However, it also has some relevant limitations in both audio and video. On the video side, be aware that it does not correctly support Dolby Vision profile 7, which is the profile used on UHD Blu-ray with a base layer (BL) and enhancement layer (EL) that must be combined into either FEL or MEL. In practice, this means that for example Kodi converts to Dolby Vision profile 8, while apps like Plex and Emby fall back to HDR10 when playing UHD Blu-ray rips in Dolby Vision. As a general rule of thumb, your UHD Blu-ray discs should be played on a UHD Blu-ray player, as this limitation applies to the majority of streaming boxes. Google TV Streamer supports Dolby Vision profile 8 and profile 5. A new feature in Google TV Streamer is hardware support for the AV1 video format, which deliver more efficient video compression than HEVC currently used for most 4K content. Google has made it a requirement for new certified Android-based TV devices to support AV1, and now Google itself is living up to its requirement with Google TV Streamer – the 4K Chromecast does not support AV1. Both YouTube and Netflix have started transitioning to AV1, but not all devices that support AV1 are getting AV1 streams. We confirmed that Google TV Streamer receives the AV1 streams from both YouTube and Netflix, as shown below.
Google TV Streamer has hardware support for AV1, which is now used on YouTube and Netflix. Photo: FlatpanelsHD
If you want to access foreign streaming services, it is worth highlighting that Google has hardcoded its own DNS into its streaming boxes. This makes it more difficult for the use to set up "smart-DNS" services to bypass geo-blocking. You should instead set up DNS in your router or look for VPN apps for Google TV Streamer. We have good experiences with NordVPN on Chromecast and Google TV Streamer. Turning our attention to audio, let us start with lossless audio, i.e. Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD MA, which is relevant for Blu-ray rips. Google TV Streamer cannot passthrough lossless HD audio formats, with or without Dolby Atmos and DTS:X, for decoding on an AV receiver or soundbar. Instead, Google TV Streamer will attempt to decode the audio file to PCM directly on the device, which is a mixed bag. The box is built on the so-called Dolby MS12 decoder, which is typical for newer streaming devices. It can decode up to Dolby Digital Plus (E-AC-3), with or without Dolby Atmos. Built into Android is a software stack that can handle certain Dolby and DTS codecs, e.g., decoding DTS-HD to 5.1 PCM and Dolby TrueHD to 7.1 PCM, although this does not always work (resulting in 2.0 PCM instead). Apps like Plex and Kodi can also transcode audio to other formats when the box falls short. Google sells its own wireless speakers called Nest Audio. The company has promised to roll out the ability to pair them wirelessly with Google TV devices to use for TV sound, but this is still not possible with Google TV Streamer. You can pair Bluetooth speakers but our experience is that it typically leads to audio/video sync issues. On the other hand, Google TV devices have gained support for spatial audio with the Google Pixel Buds Pro. We did not have a pair so we cannot comment on the experience, but it should also work on Google TV Streamer. To the media player capabilities in perspective, there are of course many nuances, but overall Google TV Streamer is not a replacement for Nvidia Shield when it comes to HD audio, so hold on to your Nvidia Shield if you have lots of Blu-ray rips stored on your network or hard drive. As for streaming from online services such as Netflix, Disney+, Max and similar, Google TV Streamer (and Nvidia Shield) is not on par with Apple TV 4K.

Google TV Streamer as a game console

Nvidia Shield, despite its decent GPU for its time, never managed to transform the Android TV gaming market. One could have hoped that Google TV Streamer, with its box format, would be a fresh start and an opportunity to lay a hardware foundation for video games on Android / Google TV. Unfortunately, it is far from that. We have already commented on the hardware in our section on benchmarks, and advanced games run locally on Google TV Streamer is impossible, even though the Android software is prepared for the task with broad support for game controllers, support for game engines, ALLM, and many other things. The closest you get are games such as Asphalt 8, which runs OK but not great on Google TV Streamer. The path to console gaming on Google TV is instead game streaming – cloud gaming – with apps such as Nvidia's GeForce Now, Amazon Luna (limited availability) and Boosteroid. As you know, Google has shut down its own Stadia service. Microsoft's Xbox app for cloud gaming is still not available on Android. Android's wide support for game controllers means that many people already have what they need to get started with cloud gaming. We will not delve into an extensive test of game streaming on Google TV Streamer, as we have already tested it on TV platforms. Our conclusion is clear: Game streaming is not an alternative to a game console but for games where latency is not critical, it can deliver an acceptable experience, and it is an enticing thought; being able to play new console games on the TV without a physical console. Game controllers from, for example, Xbox connect without issues to Google TV Streamer and they can also be used to navigate the interface. It is even possible to connect a mouse and keyboard to play certain games via a USB-C hub. You must remember to set your TV to Game mode to reduce input lag, which can easily be over 100 ms by default on TVs. On top of that comes the lag to the streaming server, which is also significant, and Bluetooth controller latency, which is not negligible either. However, due to the lack of an Xbox app, the lack of 120fps support on Google TV Streamer (which significantly reduces latency), the lack of local server infrastructure for game streaming in many regions, questionable video quality and stability, there are still many pieces that need to fall into place before we would dare to call Google TV Streamer even a marginal competitor to game consoles such as PlayStation and Xbox. At this stage in the transition from x86 to ARM processor architecture, we would have been more excited to see a focus on game run locally in hardware on Google TV. This is – unlike the state of game streaming – definitely not utopian. Just look at where Nintendo stands after switching to ARM processors in the Switch, which has sufficient, although certainly not powerful, hardware. Android could have been at least the same place as Switch through targeted investments but what comes first; the chicken or the egg? In this case, it is definitely the hardware in Google TV devices that is simply too weak and unambitious.

Google TV Streamer as a home hub

Google TV Streamer can control connected devices in the smart home, such as lights in the living room and temperature via the Google Home platform, which now has its own menu item in the control center. Other Google TV devices will also soon receive this via an update but Google TV Streamer will still be the only one with a built-in Thread radio for use with Matter. Thread is a relatively new low-energy wireless communication protocol that communicates over IP and builds its own mesh network. In theory, this means that the more Thread devices you have in your home, the more stable and far-reaching a connected home with Thread will become, as the devices communicate directly with each other. Thread requires no separate hubs, but it does require a so-called Thread border router, and this can be built into devices such as TVs, speakers and streaming boxes, which is exactly what has been done with Google TV Streamer, thus acting as a multi-hub for Google Home via WiFi, Ethernet and Thread. Thread requires Matter support for home automation, which Google TV Streamer also has. At present, there are very few home devices on the market with Thread so time will tell if home automation takes off this time via devices like Google TV Streamer and Apple TV 4K (2022), which also has a built-in Thread border router. However, we were able to test the Google Home integration in more general terms and here we found that Google TV Streamer handles the task well. Home devices responded quickly when, for example, you turn off the lights from the Google Home panel on the TV. Here is the new Google Home panel in the control center on Google TV Streamer. Note that we can control for example temperature, but also to some extent other Google TVs.

Google Home

Google Home control on Google TV. Photo: FlatpanelsHD

However, there are limitations in the software. The home devices you see in the Google Home panel on Google TV Streamer are the 'favorites' that you have selected in the Google Home app on your smartphone. This cannot be changed specifically on Google TV Streamer, so that only selected devices or automations are displayed. It is not possible to change depending on which room the box is placed in either. This is a software limitations so we hope for expanded functionality in the future. Another limitation is the Picture-in-Picture (PiP) function for use with cameras. It only works fully with Google Nest video doorbells, although you can still get a small notification from other compatible video doorbells. With Google's own devices, you also only get a video preview when activity is detected with a ring – not with motion detection. The Picture-in-Picture function does not work with streaming apps at all. This form of home control has been a primary reason for Google's shift from dongle to box, and a primary reason for the increased price, but unless you already are fully invested in Google Home ecosystem, our impression is that Google TV Streamer is not quite mature enough to act as a home hub, while the market for Thread devices is also in a very early phase. Give it a few years.

Conclusion

Google TV Streamer is now a box – just like Nvidia Shield and Apple TV 4K – but only in appearance, not performance, as the CPU and GPU are just as weak as those in Chromecast with Google TV. This sets limitations both today and in the future but we still appreciate the increase in RAM, which allows for more active apps in background, along with significantly increased storage space, which enables users to install many more apps. The AV1 video format is also now supported in hardware.
Ad:
The biggest news in Google TV Streamer is the Google Home component with a built-in Thread radio, allowing the box to act as a Thread border router along with Matter. Here, Google TV Streamer is a bit ahead of its time as there are still very few home devices that support Thread. Google Home control via the control panel is a new feature but it will also come to other Google TV devices (without Thread) soon. Thread is a primary reason for the shift to a box format. Google TV Streamer is a decent media player with access to nearly all relevant streaming apps, including, both international and local ones, from Google TV's app store, plus support for 4K, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos. Additionally, you have Google Cast (Chromecast) built-in. However, the Google TV Streamer does not match Apple TV 4K, as Google's frame rate matching is currently limited to Netflix among streamers, causing a lot of video content to stutter. SDR/HDR matching works correctly. Google TV Streamer does not match Nvidia Shield either when it comes to local media playback, as HD audio formats cannot be passed through. Google TV Streamer cannot be considered a 'game console' and it is a shame that Google has not used the switch to a box format as a springboard to expand Google TV into a gaming platform. Instead, one must look toward cloud gaming but the Xbox – and Stadia – app is missing. FlatpanelsHD does not advise owners of Chromecast with Google TV to rush out and buy Google TV Streamer – there are too few new features. The streaming box is, unlike its predecessor, too expensive to be an impulse buy, and in this price range you should seriously consider paying the modest premium to get Nvidia Shield (review here) or Apple TV 4K (review here). Google TV Streamer is certainly a decent streaming box, but ultimately it falls a bit short.

Price and retailers:

US retailer
UK retailer
DE retailer


Google TV's full app catalog
Android features & Google Cast
Increased storage & RAM, AV1
4K, HDR10+, Dolby Vision & Atmos
Low power consumption
Built-in Thread for Matter


Weak hardware & performance
Only frame rate matching on Netflix
Only WiFi 5 & Bluetooth 5.1
Increasing number of ads
Price